Despite growing public awareness and policy efforts, gender equality has not yet been fully established in Western societies. Previous research has shown that hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes, which are grounded in traditional gender stereotypes, play a key role in the reproduction of gender inequalities. Whereas, hostile and benevolent sexism among adolescents has been previously studied, limited attention has been paid to social characteristics in understanding the support for these attitudes. In this article, we aim to study how the family, the school and romantic partnerships relate to adolescents’ benevolent and hostile sexist attitudes. We relied on data gathered in 2013 by the Flemish Youth Research Platform and performed multivariate analyses on 755 parent-child dyads (n> = 342; n+ = 413). Our results indicate that social characteristics especially matter to explain the variation in benevolent sexist attitudes among girls and hostile sexist attitudes among boys. Among girls, being in a romantic relationship and parents’ traditional moral beliefs was strongly related to benevolent sexism; while for boys, hostile sexism was strongly related to being enrolled in technical and vocational education. In the conclusion, we elaborate on the implications of our findings.
Addition
In recent times gender equivalence has never just acquired growing societal notice, but has feel an important policy topic during the West societies. Yet not, despite enduring jobs, gender equivalence has not yet come totally established in regards to a job price, labor field standing, commission, contribution inside decision-to make ranks, workshare from the house and child care (The world Lender, 2011; Eu, 2017). No matter if multiple grounds lay behind such persistent gender inequalities, it is unignorable one to conventional gender values and stereotypes (i.e., gender bias) play a switch character. Very early in life, boys, and you can girls is actually coached how to respond, just what items in order to instance otherwise would and just what toys or dresses so you’re able to choose (Eccles et al., 2000). In the age of cuatro to five years dated, pupils show gender stereotypical preferences having, such as for example, girls preferring intimate stories and you may boys tilting on more daring of them (Durkin and you will Nugent, 1998). Such gender stereotypes carry cultural meanings, means and (role) criterion you to organize lives by tend to (subtly) influencing and you will guiding people’s philosophy, thinking, perceptions, and you can routines (Eckes and Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and you can Correll, 2004). Throughout teens, these types of gender stereotypes end in boys and you will girls mainly hanging out with same-sex peers and you can playfully avoiding each other (Powlishta, 2003; ). During the adolescence so it reduction games disappears due to the emergence from sexual interest and you can a desire for closeness (Maccoby, 1998; Rudman and Glick, 2008). Such shifting intergroup relationships give the study away from adolescents’ sexist attitudes very interesting. Sexist attitudes and you will values confine and determine upcoming existence trajectories because of the (commonly subtly) influencing viewpoints, emotions, and you will practices (Eckes and you can Trautner, 2000; Ridgeway and you can Correll, 2004). It suggest gender-particular habits and you will positions you to definitely hinder more youthful mans power to detect the variety of psychological, personal, and educational capacities and you can choice which is often forecast (Rainey and Corrosion, 1999; Paul Halpern and you may Perry-Jenkins, 2016). At some point, that it undermines (policy) operate that focus on gender equivalence (Glick ainsi que al., 2001).
Benevolent and Aggressive Sexism when you look at the Social Spheres: The Impression out-of Parents, University and you may Relationship into Belgian Adolescents’ Sexist Thinking
In what public contexts do sexist thinking exist next? Research has not even thoroughly learned the latest possible personal variation out-of sexist thinking certainly teenagers. Despite having a huge extra worth when you look at the wearing opinion towards the sexist attitudes, very browse on this subject material has been primarily accomplished by psychologists who commonly work on apparently smaller than average homogeneous trials. Statistically it has got therefore already been hard to research the new societal version away from sexist thinking. Previous search among (young) people has already revealed that socio-economic circumstances such as income, work standing and you will educational attainment connect with people’s socio-political perceptions (Crompton and you can Lyonette, 2005; Davis and Greenstein, 2009; ). According to so it, i assume that people’s public history things whenever discovering sexist attitudes. Thus, this study will explore exactly how socio-monetary and social points relate genuinely to both benevolent and you may aggressive sexist attitudes certainly adolescents regarding a sociological direction. We accomplish that by simply following Glick and you may Fiske’s (1996) distinction between aggressive and you may benevolent sexist attitudes. To understand the new socio-economic and you can cultural background from adolescents i separate ranging from ascribed and achieved public functions.
